There are several very large drawbacks to NSFW character AI, most obviously in ethical issues surrounding privacy and data usage simply due the potential for creating content utilizing images of real life people without any actual thought about their feelings or what they’d be ok with. The most substantial problem is that AI does not feel empathy and entirely on purely based statistics of modeling language. While AI can recognize emotion with around 85% accuracy, this is far from an empathetic response and often falls short of delivering the level you hope for in human interaction — otherwise it just feels canned or even robotic. And it shows through the lack of emotional engagement greedy users expect and receive only shallow pretense empathy.
and there are also privacy risks of using nsfw character ai. Given that sensitive content is generated by millions of users, companies are processing and storing terabytes (tb) or petabytes (pb) of data which must be secure. Although the European Union GDPR puts in place rigid data handling to protect user privacy, with or without compliance still you need measures from a continuous attack by Data breach. This is an opportunity to point out a tale as old as time in 2021: A major AI company was breached, affecting hundreds of thousands of users (sound familiar?), making it very clear many people do not realize the information they store and — more importantly — share with these platforms can be at risk.
Also, the AI of NSFW characters will often promote user reliance and that gives our psychology a challenge. 30% of AI-users feel inhibited to communicate with real life people as a result, this was confirmed by the American Psychological Association. Eero Paloheimo surmises that this trend — wherein those who seek company from AI only get worse at networking with others, having just got better after all the years of misanthropic practice thereof -might be a way in which AIs can affect human interaction and maybe manage your social isolation even when you are not alone.
Another con is the customization fees Given that most popular platforms charge between $10 and $30 a month for premium customization options, it is cost prohibitive to the majority of users. And this tiered access structure can restrict the experience of freelance users, resulting in a separation of quality interaction between them based on what they are willing to pay. Customization increases user interactions but the price may scare away some people or make it difficult to access all functionality.
Tristan Harris other AI ethics voices have suggested that NSFW AI platforms should help cultivate mindful usage, not make it easier to get sucked in — that is more of the trend we covered about two years ago. His statement that “AI’s purpose should aid human life, not replace parts of it requiring real empathy and understanding” goes right along with Harris’ message. His perspective indicates the necessity of acknowledging and addressing both constraints and ethical concerns as to how AI can insert itself into increasingly intimate human interactions.
In doing this, they begin to understand both its allure and its fundamental incapacity; the result is still a tool that much like nsfw ai in abstract remains amazing but unable to create an authentic connection due only partially having human depth. This limitation, along with possible harm to privacy and cost addressing customization or psychological issues shows the slowly-but-surely side of its usage.